[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:03:36 +0300 |
> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:36:54 +0900 (JST)
> cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>,
> 26650@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> >> + (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook
> >> + (lambda () (if (> (recursion-depth) 0) (top-level))) nil t)
> >
> > This will throw to top-level when _any_ buffer is killed, as long as
> > we are in recursive-edit, no?
> No, because `add-hook' is called with non-nil LOCAL arg.
Right, sorry for not paying attention.
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, npostavs, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, npostavs, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, npostavs, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/04/26