[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS & Gettext
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: CVS & Gettext |
Date: |
11 Apr 2002 16:23:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
>>>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
>> Err, but is this really what is recommended? It means, if my
>> reading is correct, that you will simply not use
>> internationalization on systems that don't have GNU Gettext.
Bruno> Yes, this is what it means. The reasoning is that nowadays, the
Bruno> glibc based systems are more important than other Unix
Bruno> systems.
Yep, I know this thinking. I was actually waiting to see it spreading
before actually using it.
Bruno> By recommending AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external]) we hope that more
Bruno> packages will become i18ned, since they don't have to carry
Bruno> around 500 KB of C code with them. The poor OSF/1 and Solaris
Bruno> users who want i18ned software should install gettext first,
Bruno> and they will be rewarded by a shared library libintl.so
Bruno> (instead of a static one earlier, which increased the size of
Bruno> every executable).
Yep, that's very good, indeed.
I suppose it still requires for the other maintainers to install
Gettext too right? So really intl is to be cvsignore ;)
Bruno> Still, there are some bugs in the autoconf macros in
Bruno> 0.11.1. I'd recommend AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external]) only starting
Bruno> from gettext 0.11.2.
Point taken, I'll wait for it. Thanks!
Re: CVS & Gettext, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/11
- Re: CVS & Gettext, Bruno Haible, 2002/04/11
- Re: CVS & Gettext, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/11
- Re: CVS & Gettext, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/11
- Re: CVS & Gettext, Bruno Haible, 2002/04/12
- Re: CVS & Gettext, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/18
Re: CVS & Gettext, Bruno Haible, 2002/04/12
Re: CVS & Gettext, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/18