bug-gnu-utils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sed-4.2.1 test failures


From: Ryan Hill
Subject: Re: sed-4.2.1 test failures
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:19:22 -0600

On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:20:23 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:45, Nelson H. F. Beebe <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I've just been through the logs of 39 test builds of sed-4.2.1 on
> > about 25 flavors of Unix covering all of the major desktop CPU
> > architectures.  Of those builds, 27 passed all of the tests, and the
> > new sed has been installed on the corresponding systems.
> >
> > However, on a few systems, I'm seeing consistent failure of the same
> > tests, suggesting an error, or other platform difference, in the tests
> > themselves, as opposed to the sed executable.
> >
> > GNU/Linux AMD64 Red Hat 5.6:
> >
> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-1.sed < ./utf8-1.inp | 
> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-1.out
> >        ./utf8-1.good utf8-1.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        ./utf8-1.inp utf8-1.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        FAIL: utf8-1
> >
> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-2.sed < ./utf8-2.inp | 
> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-2.out
> >        ./utf8-2.good utf8-2.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        ./utf8-2.inp utf8-2.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        FAIL: utf8-2
> >
> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-3.sed < ./utf8-3.inp | 
> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-3.out
> >        ./utf8-3.good utf8-3.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        ./utf8-3.inp utf8-3.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        FAIL: utf8-3
> >
> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-4.sed < ./utf8-4.inp | 
> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-4.out
> >        ./utf8-4.good utf8-4.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        ./utf8-4.inp utf8-4.out differ: char 1, line 1
> >        FAIL: utf8-4
> >
> >        ======================================
> >        4 of 65 tests failed
> >        Please report to address@hidden
> >        ======================================
> 
> This looks like the configure checks should have XFAILed the tests.

Sounds like the opposite of
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2010-04/msg00012.html


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting,                  it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets                           but i'll take it free anytime
@ gentoo.org                EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]