Re: [bug-gnu-utils] sed-4.2.1 test failures

[Paolo Bonzini]

I think it's best if I make a prerelease and ask Nelson to test that one.

Paolo

2011/6/25, Ryan Hill <address@hidden>:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:20:23 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:45, Nelson H. F. Beebe <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>> > I've just been through the logs of 39 test builds of sed-4.2.1 on
>> > about 25 flavors of Unix covering all of the major desktop CPU
>> > architectures.  Of those builds, 27 passed all of the tests, and the
>> > new sed has been installed on the corresponding systems.
>> >
>> > However, on a few systems, I'm seeing consistent failure of the same
>> > tests, suggesting an error, or other platform difference, in the tests
>> > themselves, as opposed to the sed executable.
>> >
>> > GNU/Linux AMD64 Red Hat 5.6:
>> >
>> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-1.sed < ./utf8-1.inp |
>> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-1.out
>> >        ./utf8-1.good utf8-1.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        ./utf8-1.inp utf8-1.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        FAIL: utf8-1
>> >
>> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-2.sed < ./utf8-2.inp |
>> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-2.out
>> >        ./utf8-2.good utf8-2.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        ./utf8-2.inp utf8-2.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        FAIL: utf8-2
>> >
>> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-3.sed < ./utf8-3.inp |
>> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-3.out
>> >        ./utf8-3.good utf8-3.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        ./utf8-3.inp utf8-3.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        FAIL: utf8-3
>> >
>> >        LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8  ../sed/sed -f ./utf8-4.sed < ./utf8-4.inp |
>> > LC_ALL=C tr -d \r > utf8-4.out
>> >        ./utf8-4.good utf8-4.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        ./utf8-4.inp utf8-4.out differ: char 1, line 1
>> >        FAIL: utf8-4
>> >
>> >        ======================================
>> >        4 of 65 tests failed
>> >        Please report to address@hidden
>> >        ======================================
>>
>> This looks like the configure checks should have XFAILed the tests.
>
> Sounds like the opposite of
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2010-04/msg00012.html
>
>
> --
> fonts, gcc-porting,                  it makes no sense how it makes no sense
> toolchain, wxwidgets                           but i'll take it free anytime
> @ gentoo.org                EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4
> 0662
>

-- 
Inviato dal mio dispositivo mobile