[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU sed maintainers, please document GNU sed's "-E" option (which is
From: |
David A. Wheeler |
Subject: |
Re: GNU sed maintainers, please document GNU sed's "-E" option (which is now in POSIX) |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:32:43 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:17:42 +0200, address@hidden (Jose E. Marchesi) wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> Thank you for submitting the patch. Given that -E has been added to
> POSIX I see nothing wrong on documenting -E along with -r.
Great!
> Would you like to update your patch and resend it using git
> format-patch?
>
> Thanks :)
Sure. Here's the updated patch, with all changes requested, using git
format-patch.
--- David A. Wheeler
P.S.: The changes requested were:
> Could you please provide a ChangeLog entry documenting the changes?
...
> Please replace `less backslashes' with `fewer backslashes' as Bruce suggested.
... (code snippet)
> That comment about -E being in POSIX is unnecessary. Just remove the
> comment claiming that -E is not documented.
0001-Modify-documentation-to-note-sed-E-option-now-in.patch
Description: Text Data
Re: GNU sed maintainers, please document GNU sed's "-E" option (which is now in POSIX), Jose E. Marchesi, 2013/10/15
- Re: GNU sed maintainers, please document GNU sed's "-E" option (which is now in POSIX),
David A. Wheeler <=