Re: [Bug-gnubg] Export HTML-images : 2 are missing

[Jim Segrave]

On Fri 27 Dec 2002 (21:54 -0500), Gary Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 12:40:23AM +0100, Jim Segrave wrote:
> > The list of fixes etc. from the early 2.0 releases is quite
> > impressive. I dowloaded it in the hopes it would remove the gtkextra
> > warnings from configure (it expects a gtkextra-2, which, as far as I
> > can tell is not currently released.
> 
> Right.  But you can check it out from CVS, with CVSROOT:
> 
>     :pserver:address@hidden:/cvsroot/gtkextra
> 
> module "gtkextra-2".  Unfortunately the gtkextra-2.0.pc.in file is missing
> a CFLAGS definition -- add a line like:
> 
>     Cflags: -I${includedir}/gtkextra-2.0
> 
> so that gnubg can pick up the right flags from pkg-config.  (I've reported
> this to the GtkExtra people, but it's not fixed in CVS yet.)

It also doesn't have a configure script.
If you copy one from the gtk+extra-0.99.17, you then find you need:

config.sub
config.guess
ltconfig
ltmain.sh
Makefile.in

etc.

Unless you are supposed to move the files over a 0.99.17 version, I'd
guess the gtkextra-2 stuff is not ready for building by
non-developers.

I notice the docs still say it requires gtk-1.2,

I idly tried copying the files over a gtk+extra 0.99.17 version,
deleting config.cache and doing a configure. That still looked like it
had found and wanted to use the gtk-1.2 include and library files,
even though I also have gtk-2.2 installed. Deleting Makefile.in led to
complaints that the Makefile.am was from an older version of automake,
but aclocal didn't like the aclocal.m4. All in all, this doesn't look
like a promising way to try to build it.

I guess for the moment I
will forgo whatever gtkextra is supposed to add to gnubg.



-- 
Jim Segrave           address@hidden