RE: [Bug-gnubg] new weights 0.12b

[Moore, Dave]

Confirmed.  I see the 12/31 version after extracting from the archive.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Silver [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 10:21 AM
To: 'Nardy Pillards'
Cc: 'GNUBackgammon bug reporting'
Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] new weights 0.12b


Ok, I got the file you sent and it worked. The new weights are correctly
dated Dec 31st, so many thanks. However, I'd have a clearer conscience
knowing others are getting the right ones. Could someone else confirm
that the contents of file they are getting is dated Dec 31 and not Dec
13? To do so, when opening it, just click on Open with Winzip (at least
that's what I get) and see the date of the zipped file. 

                                                Albert

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Nardy Pillards
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Albert Silver
Cc: 'GNUBackgammon bug reporting'
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] new weights 0.12b

> See what I see then. Look at the date of the weights (unless it is
> supposed to be dated Dec 13) in the Zipped file.
> 
> Albert
> 

No, it has to Dec 31.
I'll email gnubg.wd to your address

Nardy


> > I cleared my cache and downloaded it again. The weights are still
> dated
> > Dec. 13, 10:07 AM
> >
> > Albert
> 
> http://users.skynet.be/bk228456/gnubg.wdZip.exe
> and it is 021231 (md5: BCEA7C2515B49D764901B891538E1708)
> (and the 021231 build shows 0.12b.... but does it even with an old
> weights
> file)
> 
> Nardy
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg




_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg