bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] New feature: Target help when dragging a chequer


From: Jim Segrave
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New feature: Target help when dragging a chequer
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:07:35 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Mon 24 Feb 2003 (20:50 +0100), Holger wrote:
> At 19:40 24.02.2003 +0100, Jim Segrave wrote:
> >On Mon 24 Feb 2003 (19:19 +0100), Holger wrote:
> > > Thanks. Btw, I'm afraid I forgot to include an update for Changelog.
> 
> I meant both patches, also the drag target help. For this a Changelog entry 
> is still missing. Sorry, but I didn't think of this earlier. Actually, I 
> presumed somehow that this gets done automatically.

Actually, I wrote an entry in ChangeLog and then didn't commit it -
now fixed.


> > > And speaking of which: In general who should do this, always the one
> > > submitting the patch or the person who commits it in CVS? :-)
> >
> >Either one - I put an entry into Changelog for this. I haven't rebuilt
> >to try having commands for next/previous marked moves, but it sounds a
> >very reasonable idea and if I get a chance I'll do it this
> >evening. But maybe you should get cvs commit rights?
>
> Hm, wow. I wouldn't have thought of this, at least not yet. But I'm not to 
> decide this. If you developers think, that it's ok, I feel honoured.
> If not then I'm not responsible for the things that get committed. ;-) And 
> I wouldn't need to fiddle with the CVS options myself. This doesn't seem to 
> be the easiest.

I certainly don't mind doing the commits, I just hope people read the
ChangeLog and realise that I didn't do the work. I've commited your
commands for next/previous marked moves (and fixed the missing
ChangeLog entries for your other patches).

-- 
Jim Segrave           address@hidden





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]