Re: [Bug-gnubg] python gnubg.match() command

[Joseph Heled]

I am kind of hoping you guys would upgrade to Python 2.3 instead of me 
putting in those ugly ifdefs

-Joseph


Achim wrote:
> Am Die, 2003-08-12 um 01.07 schrieb Joseph Heled:
>
> > I am committing an initial version of python gnubg.match().
> > Perhaps premature, but I am looking for
> >  - others compiling it on various machines.
> >  - others trying it out
> >  - comments (of any kind)
> >
> > Please understand that it is not complete, might contain bugs, and is 
> > likely to change, so don't start writing any big scripts please ...
>
>
> /usr/lib/python2.2/config/libpython2.2.a(posixmodule.o)(.text+0x3913):
> In function `posix_tmpnam':
> : the use of `tmpnam_r' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
> /usr/lib/python2.2/config/libpython2.2.a(posixmodule.o)(.text+0x382a):
> In function `posix_tempnam':
> : the use of `tempnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
> gnubgmodule.o(.text+0x223e): In function `PythonGame':
> : undefined reference to `PyBool_FromLong'
> gnubgmodule.o(.text+0x2f85): In function `PythonGame':
> : undefined reference to `PyBool_FromLong'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [gnubg] Fehler 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ace/local/src/gnubg'
> make: *** [install-recursive] Fehler 1
>
> Gentoo, Python 2.2.3
>
> Ciao
>
> Achim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg