bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnubg] Concerning 3d, reply to archive message.


From: Marco van Tol
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Concerning 3d, reply to archive message.
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:34:35 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Hello all,

In the archives I noted an email from Jim Segrave where he mentiones a
colleague with a Matrox G550 graphics board, which has DRI support, but
won't get recoqnized by gnubg as an accelerated graphics board.

That colleague is me. :)

In the mean time, I tried the same thing at home, where I have a
Pentium 4 2.8Ghz with an nVidia 5600FX card with 256MB of graphics memory.

The gnubg performance test with that board without shadows or other options
ticked on is 74 frames per second. Needless to say the 3d experience is
fluent. :-)

The only things I noted are the following:
- gnubg also does not recoqnize this board as being graphics accelerated.
- I do have DRI support for this card. (I attached the output of glxinfo)
- The operating system I run this on is FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p2.
- If I setup the game in 3d mode, with the default panels on the right, the
  screen gets _completely garbled_ when I disable/take away the last panel.
  Bits and pieces of a backgammon board are all over the screen. (Within the
  gnubg window however) :-)

Attachments:
- XFree86.0.log
- Output of glxinfo

----//----
0:address@hidden marco]glxgears
===> default size on a 1600x1200/24bit display
10678 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2135.600 FPS
12417 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2483.400 FPS
12422 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2484.400 FPS
12420 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2484.000 FPS
8292 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1658.400 FPS
===> full screen on a 1600x1200/24bit display
666 frames in 5.0 seconds = 133.200 FPS
665 frames in 5.0 seconds = 133.000 FPS
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
----//----

Unfortunately, I don't have as much OpenGL programming experience as I would
like to, which makes it a bit hard for me to diagnose why gnubg does not
recoqnize the graphics board as 'hardware accelerated' myself. I intent to
assist in the matter though. ;-)

Please let me know if you want any more info.

Kind regards,

Marco

P.S. I am not the fastest replier on the planet, but I will keep an eye on
the list. :)

-- 
Marco van Tol

Attachment: XFree86.0.log
Description: Text document

Attachment: glxinfo.20030906.out
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]