Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg: DOC - PNG not recognized

[Jim Segrave]

On Sun 07 Sep 2003 (03:23 +0200), Jim Segrave wrote:
> On Sun 07 Sep 2003 (13:18 +1200), Joseph Heled wrote:
> > 'gmake -k' or 'gmake gnubg' might be useful when a subdir is broken.
> > 
> > -Joseph
> > 
> > Jim Segrave wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >I don't believe it's possible to build gnubg fresh from CVS with the
> > >current state of the doc directory. Make stops here. How can you get
> > >makeinfo to run?
> > >
> 
> Yes, but the problem needs to be addressed. I don't know how the text
> versions of the graphics files are generated for the info file or I'd
> generate them and commit them myself.

But Oystein has committed a slightly different but equally effective
fix and I can again do a complete build from cold. Thanks.

-- 
Jim Segrave           address@hidden