[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:55:23 -0000 |
From: Massimiliano Maini
Sent: 12 November 2007 14:57
For the sake of clarity, since the significant figure is the one
in MWC,
I would put the EMG lucks in brackets (right now the MWC lucks
are in
brackets). Swapping the two should have no impact on money
sessions,
since for money the two are equal (equities).
Also, the label "Luck rate (total)" followed by something like
"-0.920 ( -5.335%)" is misleading: it looks like that "(
-5.335%)"
is the "(total)" ...
What about this:
Luck rate, total (EMG) +16,885% (-0,068)
-13,908% (+0,178)
Luck rate, per move (EMG) +0,241% (-1,0)
-0,196% (+2,5)
For money it would be something like:
Luck rate, total (EMG) -0,068 (-0,068)
+0,178 (+0,178)
Luck rate, per move (EMG) -1,0 (-1,0)
+2,5 (+2,5)
MaX.
This has always confused me a bit. I think that Max's layout is clearer.
For money, I assume the EMG can differ from the total if all your bad
luck was on high cubes and your good luck on low cubes (it never happens
the other way round ;) That is, the EMG is normalised to a 1-cube,
right?
-- Ian
- [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Massimiliano Maini, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Christian Anthon, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Massimiliano Maini, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Christian Anthon, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Massimiliano Maini, 2007/11/12
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?,
Ian Shaw <=
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Massimiliano Maini, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Christian Anthon, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Massimiliano Maini, 2007/11/13
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Ian Shaw, 2007/11/13
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Luck rates ?, Massimiliano Maini, 2007/11/13