[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Redundant AC_LIBSOURCES calls
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Redundant AC_LIBSOURCES calls |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:06:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
I propose the patch attached below; an explanation follows:
I think that when AC_LIBOBJ and friends was designed, the idea was
to use
some testing
if foo_is_broken; then
AC_LIBOBJ([foo])
fi
The AC_LISOURCE/AC_LIBSOURCES macros were also made visible, so that
the user can name additional sources, when necessary.
Actually, gnulib needs foo.h in most cases, because the module fixes
also a broken declaration, not only broken implementation.
But in the basic case, when only the implementation is fixed and no
header is needed, I see no advantage in adding a redundant call to
AC_LIBSOURCES.
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
gnulib-20050923-libsources.patch
Description: Text document
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/20
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Simon Josefsson, 2005/09/21
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Stepan Kasal, 2005/09/21
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Simon Josefsson, 2005/09/21
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Stepan Kasal, 2005/09/22
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Simon Josefsson, 2005/09/22
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Stepan Kasal, 2005/09/22
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/22
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Stepan Kasal, 2005/09/23
- Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Stepan Kasal, 2005/09/23
- Redundant AC_LIBSOURCES calls,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Redundant AC_LIBSOURCES calls, Bruno Haible, 2005/09/23
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Redundant AC_LIBSOURCES calls, Stepan Kasal, 2005/09/23
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: regex-0.12's regex.h seems to have a little bug, Bruno Haible, 2005/09/21