[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1 |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:39:26 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> At this point, I really think it is easier to generate a replacement
> <wchar.h> that takes care of the intricacies,
Yes, I'd like a wchar module that provides wchar.h, so that we can
remove HAVE_WCHAR_H from most of the code.
> Also, there are 8 files in lib/* that check HAVE_WCHAR_H - is there
> really a modern platform that lacks this header?
In practice I'd guess almost all GNU targets have <wchar.h> these
days. But there's a caveat: the C standard does not require <wchar.h>
of freestanding implementations, and officially GCC is freestanding.
It could be that some libraries using gnulib will want to port to
small environments that lack the full C library. I admit I'm waving
my hands here, though; I don't personally know of such an environment
being used as a GNU target.
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, (continued)
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/10
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/10
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/11
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/12
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/12
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/13
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/12
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/13