[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:49:03 +0200 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'm a little leery of this argument-transposing change:
>>
>> xstrtol The first two arguments of STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR
>> are now an option name and option argument
>> instead of an option argument and a type string,
>>
>> All callers will have to be updated, else will emit bogus diagnostics.
>> But that's not a big deal.
>
> As far as I know, only coreutils uses STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR, so it should
> be OK.
>
>> You're welcome to check in the gnulib changes -- assuming no one
>> objects -- or I will.
>
> OK, thanks, I checked it into gnulib. I'll reply in a separate
> message about OPT etc.
find's locate.c uses it, too.
Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/08/04