[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] getdate add a week when the wday is the same as the current
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] getdate add a week when the wday is the same as the current one |
Date: |
Sun, 03 May 2009 09:39:57 +0200 |
Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> I fixed the regression you found and added some new tests.
...
>>From 0e1af7775a82aed00331a535ddadee2753d12e5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:44:30 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH]
> =?utf-8?q?*=20lib/getdate.y=20(get=5Fdate):=20Correct=20the=20calculation=20of=20tm=5Fmday=20so
> =20that=20e.g.,=20"next=20tues"=20(when=20run=20on=20a=20tuesday)=20results=20in=20a=20date
...
> diff --git a/lib/getdate.y b/lib/getdate.y
...
> @@ -1435,7 +1435,9 @@ get_date (struct timespec *result, char const *p,
> struct timespec const *now)
> if (pc.days_seen && ! pc.dates_seen)
> {
> tm.tm_mday += ((pc.day_number - tm.tm_wday + 7) % 7
> - + 7 * (pc.day_ordinal - (0 < pc.day_ordinal)));
> + + 7 * (pc.day_ordinal
> + - (0 < pc.day_ordinal
> + && tm.tm_wday != pc.day_number)));
Thank you!
I've just pushed the following two change-sets.
The first is yours modulo log syntax and spaces vs. TABs,
then one that tightens the tests to require exact values, not just ">".
>From 9b518aa03eb0ea04dac464d0bb4db6377d84cf79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:23:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] getdate: correctly interpret "next monday" when run on a
Monday
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
* lib/getdate.y (get_date): Correct the calculation of tm_mday so
that e.g., "next tues" (when run on a tuesday) results in a date
that is one week in the future, and not today's date.
I.e., add a week when the wday is the same as the current one.
Reported by Tom Broadhurst in http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?25406,
and earlier by Martin Bernreuther and Jan Minář.
* tests/test-getdate.c (main): Check that "next DAY" is always in
the future and that "last DAY" is always in the past.
---
ChangeLog | 12 +++++++++++
lib/getdate.y | 10 +++++---
tests/test-getdate.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 3d72119..15bc793 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2009-05-03 Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden>
+
+ getdate: correctly interpret "next monday" when run on a Monday
+ * lib/getdate.y (get_date): Correct the calculation of tm_mday so
+ that e.g., "next tues" (when run on a tuesday) results in a date
+ that is one week in the future, and not today's date.
+ I.e., add a week when the wday is the same as the current one.
+ Reported by Tom Broadhurst in http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?25406,
+ and earlier by Martin Bernreuther and Jan Minář.
+ * tests/test-getdate.c (main): Check that "next DAY" is always in
+ the future and that "last DAY" is always in the past.
+
2009-05-02 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
build: ensure that a release build fails when a submodule is unclean
diff --git a/lib/getdate.y b/lib/getdate.y
index 877b264..2f3c924 100644
--- a/lib/getdate.y
+++ b/lib/getdate.y
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
%{
/* Parse a string into an internal time stamp.
- Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
+ Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
@@ -404,12 +404,12 @@ zone:
day:
tDAY
{
- pc->day_ordinal = 1;
+ pc->day_ordinal = 0;
pc->day_number = $1;
}
| tDAY ','
{
- pc->day_ordinal = 1;
+ pc->day_ordinal = 0;
pc->day_number = $1;
}
| tORDINAL tDAY
@@ -1435,7 +1435,9 @@ get_date (struct timespec *result, char const *p, struct
timespec const *now)
if (pc.days_seen && ! pc.dates_seen)
{
tm.tm_mday += ((pc.day_number - tm.tm_wday + 7) % 7
- + 7 * (pc.day_ordinal - (0 < pc.day_ordinal)));
+ + 7 * (pc.day_ordinal
+ - (0 < pc.day_ordinal
+ && tm.tm_wday != pc.day_number)));
tm.tm_isdst = -1;
Start = mktime (&tm);
if (Start == (time_t) -1)
diff --git a/tests/test-getdate.c b/tests/test-getdate.c
index 7dfb09e..73c3ad1 100644
--- a/tests/test-getdate.c
+++ b/tests/test-getdate.c
@@ -48,6 +48,22 @@
#define LOG(str, now, res) (void) 0
#endif
+static const char* const day_table[] =
+{
+ "SUNDAY",
+ "MONDAY",
+ "TUESDAY",
+ "TUES",
+ "WEDNESDAY",
+ "WEDNES",
+ "THURSDAY",
+ "THUR",
+ "THURS",
+ "FRIDAY",
+ "SATURDAY",
+ NULL
+};
+
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
@@ -55,6 +71,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
struct timespec result2;
struct timespec now;
const char *p;
+ int i;
set_program_name (argv[0]);
@@ -211,5 +228,42 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
ASSERT (result.tv_sec == result2.tv_sec
&& result.tv_nsec == result2.tv_nsec);
+ /* Check that every 'last/next DAY' is in the past/future. */
+ for (i = 0; day_table[i]; i++)
+ {
+ char tmp[32];
+ sprintf (tmp, "NEXT %s", day_table[i]);
+ now.tv_sec = 4711;
+ now.tv_nsec = 1267;
+ ASSERT (get_date (&result, tmp, &now));
+ LOG (tmp, now, result);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_sec > now.tv_sec
+ && result.tv_nsec == 0);
+
+ sprintf (tmp, "LAST %s", day_table[i]);
+ now.tv_sec = 4711;
+ now.tv_nsec = 1267;
+ ASSERT (get_date (&result, tmp, &now));
+ LOG (tmp, now, result);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_sec < now.tv_sec
+ && result.tv_nsec == 0);
+ }
+
+ p = "THURSDAY UTC+00"; /* The epoch was on Thursday. */
+ now.tv_sec = 0;
+ now.tv_nsec = 0;
+ ASSERT (get_date (&result, p, &now));
+ LOG (p, now, result);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_sec == now.tv_sec
+ && result.tv_nsec == now.tv_nsec);
+
+ p = "FRIDAY UTC+00";
+ now.tv_sec = 0;
+ now.tv_nsec = 0;
+ ASSERT (get_date (&result, p, &now));
+ LOG (p, now, result);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_sec >= now.tv_sec
+ && result.tv_nsec == now.tv_nsec);
+
return 0;
}
--
1.6.3.rc4.190.g4648
>From 8d08fa04b902a9fdd504c6ceae2efb8ca650c2a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 09:17:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tests: tighten some getdate tests
* tests/test-getdate.c (main): Tighten tests: require equality,
not just greater than. Set TZ envvar to UTC0.
---
ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
tests/test-getdate.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 15bc793..817788a 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2009-05-03 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
+
+ tests: tighten some getdate tests
+ * tests/test-getdate.c (main): Tighten tests: require equality,
+ not just greater than. Set TZ envvar to UTC0.
+
2009-05-03 Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden>
getdate: correctly interpret "next monday" when run on a Monday
diff --git a/tests/test-getdate.c b/tests/test-getdate.c
index 73c3ad1..ea70527 100644
--- a/tests/test-getdate.c
+++ b/tests/test-getdate.c
@@ -53,12 +53,8 @@ static const char* const day_table[] =
"SUNDAY",
"MONDAY",
"TUESDAY",
- "TUES",
"WEDNESDAY",
- "WEDNES",
"THURSDAY",
- "THUR",
- "THURS",
"FRIDAY",
"SATURDAY",
NULL
@@ -228,25 +224,27 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
ASSERT (result.tv_sec == result2.tv_sec
&& result.tv_nsec == result2.tv_nsec);
- /* Check that every 'last/next DAY' is in the past/future. */
+ /* Check that some "next Monday", "last Wednesday", etc. are correct. */
+ putenv ("TZ=UTC0");
for (i = 0; day_table[i]; i++)
{
+ unsigned int thur2 = 7 * 24 * 3600; /* 2nd thursday */
char tmp[32];
sprintf (tmp, "NEXT %s", day_table[i]);
- now.tv_sec = 4711;
+ now.tv_sec = thur2 + 4711;
now.tv_nsec = 1267;
ASSERT (get_date (&result, tmp, &now));
LOG (tmp, now, result);
- ASSERT (result.tv_sec > now.tv_sec
- && result.tv_nsec == 0);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_nsec == 0);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_sec == thur2 + (i == 4 ? 7 : (i + 3) % 7) * 24 * 3600);
sprintf (tmp, "LAST %s", day_table[i]);
- now.tv_sec = 4711;
+ now.tv_sec = thur2 + 4711;
now.tv_nsec = 1267;
ASSERT (get_date (&result, tmp, &now));
LOG (tmp, now, result);
- ASSERT (result.tv_sec < now.tv_sec
- && result.tv_nsec == 0);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_nsec == 0);
+ ASSERT (result.tv_sec == thur2 + ((i + 3) % 7 - 7) * 24 * 3600);
}
p = "THURSDAY UTC+00"; /* The epoch was on Thursday. */
@@ -262,7 +260,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
now.tv_nsec = 0;
ASSERT (get_date (&result, p, &now));
LOG (p, now, result);
- ASSERT (result.tv_sec >= now.tv_sec
+ ASSERT (result.tv_sec == 24 * 3600
&& result.tv_nsec == now.tv_nsec);
return 0;
--
1.6.3.rc4.190.g4648