Re: [PATCH] Added a module stringops that provides STREQ and STRNEQ

[Paul Eggert]

Jim Meyering wrote:
> What about the conflict with modules/streq?
> There are over 300 uses of STREQ in gnulib and coreutils.
> Are you suggesting to change all of those?

Yes.  But if this is too much all at once, let's just call the inline 
function 'STREQ'.  We can rename it to 'streq' later, if and when we 
have the energy.

'STRNEQ' I'd still rather avoid, though.  The name is simply too 
confusing with strncmp.  Plus, the usual way to spell 'not equals' 
(dating all the way back to FORTRAN) is 'ne', not 'neq'.