bug-gnuzilla
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 12.0: /bin/bash: src/.deps/.dirstamp: Permissi


From: Fernando de Oliveira
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 12.0: /bin/bash: src/.deps/.dirstamp: Permission denied
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT)

--- Em qua, 6/6/12, Loic J. Duros escreveu:

> De: Loic J. Duros
> Assunto: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 12.0: /bin/bash: src/.deps/.dirstamp: 
> Permission denied
> Para: address@hidden
> Data: Quarta-feira, 6 de Junho de 2012, 8:46
> On 06/06/2012 04:33 AM, alexus /
> dotcommon wrote:
> > Il 06.06.2012 01:39 Loic J. Duros ha scritto:
> > 
> >> On 06/05/2012 06:59 PM, al3xu5 / dotcommon wrote:
> >>> Loic, maybe there is something 'strange' in the
> compressed release file
> >>> (icecat-12.0.tar.xz): once decompressed,
> folders have SGID set... Is it ok?
> >>> 
> >> Did you try to run it as './configure &&
> make' instead of 'sudo
> >> ./configure && make'?
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > I run it as './configure && make', without
> 'sudo'. The same when run 'install'.
> > 
> > I have already compiled some previous version of IceCat
> (9 and 10) in this way,
> > with no errors in the past [1].
> I haven't tried running install without sudo. I'll try that.
> One issue that I found is that build/unix/run-icecat.sh
> didn't have the execute bit on. This initially prevented
> running sudo make install. In any case, I'll release an
> updated version and place it in the "alpha" ftp first so
> that you can test it. It would be great if you could help
> troubleshoot the new version! :-)

On 04-06-2012 14:31, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I believe the problem comes from running ./configure with sudo (as root),
> as any new file/directory created will be owned by root. Then, you run
> make as
> normal user and have no privileges to deal with the new files/directories.

Just to thank alexus for agreeing with my previous post on 04-06-2012 about 
running configure and make as normal use. But if sudo ./configure && sudo make 
is used should also work, although in my previous mail I discuss that it is not 
recommended.

Notice that:

( sudo ./configure && sudo make ) is not the same as ( sudo ./configure && make 
).


-- 
[]s,
Fernando




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]