[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character
From: |
Norihiro Tanaka |
Subject: |
bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:54:58 +0900 |
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:40:18 -0800
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Why? The (only) caller with WCP != NULL doesn't use *WCP when
> skip_remains_mb (D, P, ..., WCP) returns P. So it's OK to not set *WCP
> in that case.
Thanks, I understood that you said. You are right. I changed the patch
so that always_character_boundary is not pruned even if WCP != NULL, and
fixed the API document.
0001-dfa-improvement-for-checking-of-multibyte-character-.patch
Description: Text document
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/12/15
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Paul Eggert, 2014/12/15
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/12/16
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Paul Eggert, 2014/12/16
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/12/16
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Paul Eggert, 2014/12/16
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/12/17
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Paul Eggert, 2014/12/17
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/12/17
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary, Paul Eggert, 2014/12/18
- bug#18777: [PATCH] dfa: improvement for checking of multibyte character boundary,
Norihiro Tanaka <=