[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24159: [PATCH] dfa: minor fix for whether dfa is fast or not
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
bug#24159: [PATCH] dfa: minor fix for whether dfa is fast or not |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:29:12 -0700 |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Norihiro Tanaka <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:29:43 -0700
>>> Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Norihiro Tanaka <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> > dfaoptimize() is not set fast flag even if it is success, but it is
>>>> > wrong.
>>>> > If success, dfa matcher uses algorithm for single byte, and it is so
>>>> > fast.
>>>> >
>>>> > I think this bug does not affect for grep, but it will affect with the
>>>> > patch that I just sent to gawk.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the patch.
>>>> I was going to push it with the attached slightly updated log message.
>>>> Note however that grep does use that -> fast member via dfasearch.c's
>>>> use of the dfaisfast function.
>>>> But then I realized I should at least verify with "make check", and
>>>> found that this makes grep's dfa-match test fail.
>>>> Thus, I will not be pushing it as-is.
>>>
>>> Thanks for review and adjustment. I re-ran all tests including dfa-match,
>>> and they were passwd again in my machine. Next, I will re-run them on
>>> Fedora24, as my machine is RHEL 6.8 and GCC 4.4.7 which is too old.
>>>
>>> However, I do not know why dfa-match test fails on your machine.
>>> dfa-match test does not use grep. It directly calls dfa functions through
>>> dfa-match-aux executable in order to test codes of dfa which grep does
>>> not use. dfa-match-aux does not referer to the ->fast member.
>>
>> I have examined the logs, which suggest it was a false positive in a
>> parallelized "make check" run, due to that test's 3-second timeout. I
>> have tried repeatedly to reproduce that failure, so far without
>> success, but in coreutils development, with parallelized tests, we
>> fixed many hard-to-reproduce tests with small timeout limits like this
>> -- most of them now use 10 seconds as the limit, so I will change this
>> one, too (and several others) with the attached patch.
>>
>> I have pushed your patch.
>
> While trying to reproduce that, I ran some tests on OS X and saw
> frequent failure of one of the tests, so wrote the attached to work
> around what I assume is an aggressive write-to-/dev/null optimization:
Dug deeper and saw it was due to grep's own new stdout-vs-/dev/null
optimization.
I've updated the comment and pushed this:
0001-tests-backref-multibyte-slow-avoid-false-positive.diff
Description: Text document