bug-gtypist
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-gtypist] GTypist 2.9 package


From: Daniel Leidert
Subject: Re: [bug-gtypist] GTypist 2.9 package
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:50:15 +0100

Hi Felix,
Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> Daniel Leidert <address@hidden> writes:
> > Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 09:31 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> >> hi Daniel,
> >> 
> >> there is a small problem with your gtypist 2.9 package: Why do you depend 
> >> on
> >> libncurses?
> >
> > The package depends on libncursesw5 not libncurses5.
> 
> I think it depends on both (from http://packages.debian.org/sid/gtypist).

What you see is, that for some architectures version 2.9 has not yet
been built. On those architectures, gtypist 2.8.x depends on ncurses5.
Just wait a few days until gtypist has been built on all architectures
and uploaded and then you'll only see ncursesw as dependency on this
site.

> > The configure script checks for it and prefers ncursesw over ncurses.
[..]
> >> if test -n "$HAVE_NCURSESW_H" -a -n "$HAVE_LIBNCURSESW";  then
> >>        LIBS="-lncursesw $LIBS"
[..]

> Yes, the comments are useless and I'have just commited a change to
> remove this from git.

Saw it. But the code above, which you left, is also not necessary.
AC_CHECK_LIB adds -lncursesw to $LIBS automatically if libncursesw is
available :) See the autoconf documentation.

[snip]
> > BTW: If your related to gtypist upstream sources, would you mind
> > checking out the open bug reports here:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/src:gtypist
> 
> Yes, sure, we have taken care of most of them already, but we should
> definitely close all of them ASAP.

Thanks for the explanation. I'll handle those being my part :) with the
next upload. Might take a few days.

Regards, Daniel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]