|
From: | Andreas Enge |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add psutils. |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:45:55 +0100 |
User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > Does it qualify as "bsd-like"? > It looks like BSD-3 to me, or at least “BSD-like”.
Sort of. Except that the second clause states that source code needs to be provided, whereas BSD just states that binary distributions need to keep the copyright notice.
I could also add an entry to the licenses file, but I am afraid we might end up with almost as many licenses as packages.
> > If not, would it make sense to add a license "other" to licenses.scm, > > which takes the same parameters as "bsd-like"? > I think (guix licenses) should export the constructor, but under the > name ‘make-license’ to avoid clashes with the ‘license’ field in > ‘package’ records.
Is this not exactly how bsd-style operates?
> Please align the opening paren under the ‘u’. > Please put the comment above the line it refers to, and move closing > parentheses to the end of the line.
Okay, no problem.
Andreas
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |