|
From: | Andreas Enge |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add psutils. |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:07:44 +0100 |
User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis: > > Is this not exactly how bsd-style operates? > Yes, but it’s only for BSD-style licenses.
Finally I think we agree. I was suggesting to create something analogous to bsd-style, just with a different name. But maybe bsd-style is enough, as the description is sufficiently vague: "This is a BSD-style, non-copyleft free software license."
Fontconfig poses the same problem: They use something that looks essentially like the MIT/X11 license, but with a slightly different wording.
So shall we create a new category, and if yes, under which name? Or shall we use "bsd-style" for anything that does not fit?
Andreas
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |