[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:44:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Honestly, I wouldn’t worry about the propagation of $GUILE_LOAD_PATH &
> co. to subprocesses, because we know there’s none anyway.
That policy will lead to future where libguile-using programs break in
random ways when they happen to be subprocesses of each other.
Shouldn't we be setting a better example than that?
If we assume that Guile will never be widely used, and encourage usage
patterns that will cause things to break if it ever becomes more
successful, then we are pretty much guaranteeing a bleak future for
Guile.
Isn't correctness more important than brevity?
What do you think?
Mark
- [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/11
- Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/11
- Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] Improve shell script headers and pre-inst-env handling, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/14
- [PATCH] Replace individual scripts with master 'guix' script, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] Replace individual scripts with master 'guix' script, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] Replace individual scripts with master 'guix' script, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] Replace individual scripts with master 'guix' script, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/16