Re: [bug-idutils] idutils.el and Emacs 22

[Jim Meyering]

Tom Tromey <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> Jim> I like all of your changes except for the part that suppresses creation
> Jim> of a per-invocation *gid-FOO* buffer in favor of a single "*gid*" buffer.
>
> Jim> Believe it or not, having *gid-FOO*, *gid-BAR*, *gid-BAZ*, etc. buffers
> Jim> simultaneously is a feature :-)
>
> I tried it a while but didn't like it.  How about making it an option?
> The appended does that, having it default to the per-invocation
> buffer-name behavior.

Nice compromise :-)
I've checked it in.