[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8)
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8) |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:53:08 +0200 |
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 01:46 -0400, Marcus Macauley wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > Marcus Macauley schreef:
> >
> >> So, Joe, whatever it is that you fixed, there still seems to be a
> >> problem [with vertical spacing] in 2.9.22.
> >> I can try to send an example if necessary.
> >
> > I think this went in for 2.9.23
>
> Actually, now in 2.9.23-1, it seems to be even worse than 2.9.22, though
> in the other direction.
If you haven't already, could you try 2.9.26?
Thanks,
Joe
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), (continued)
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/10
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/11
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Arvid Grøtting, 2006/10/12
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/12
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/13
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/13
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/14
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/14
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Joe Neeman, 2006/10/17
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8),
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: Spacing problems with 2.9.21 (as opposed to 2.8), Marcus Macauley, 2006/10/22