[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond crash
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond crash |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:10:29 +0100 |
"James Lowe" <address@hidden> wrote in message
news:address@hidden
Hello,
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden on behalf of Phil
Holmes
Sent: Sun 03/10/2010 10:57
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Lilypond crash
I've attached a graph of how both use working set memory - it does appear to
be related to trying to allocate a total of more than about 450 megs. It's
not a problem with physical memory being available - my PC has 6 Gig and
it's nowhere hear using it all.
---
What about Paged and Non-Paged Pool memory? Does it use all of this - with
windows 2003/XP there was a relatively small amount available no matter how
many GB of RAM you had, with Windows 2008/Vista/7 the memory management was
changed - I won't pretend to know how - but the NPP resources were
significantly more (esp on 64 bit machines) but even so not infinite.
James
---
This was what Windows describes as "Private Working Set". It's physical
memory, but there's lots there still to be allocated.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
- Lilypond crash, Phil Holmes, 2010/10/02
- Re: Lilypond crash, Graham Percival, 2010/10/02
- Re: Lilypond crash, Phil Holmes, 2010/10/02
- Re: Lilypond crash, Phil Holmes, 2010/10/03
- Re: Lilypond crash, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/05
- Re: Lilypond crash, Phil Holmes, 2010/10/05
- Re: Lilypond crash, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/06
- Message not available
- Re: Lilypond crash, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/06
- Re: Lilypond crash, Arno Waschk, 2010/10/06
- Re: Lilypond crash, Phil Holmes, 2010/10/09
- RE: Lilypond crash, James Lowe, 2010/10/10
- Re: Lilypond crash, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/10
- Re: Lilypond crash, Phil Holmes, 2010/10/11
- Re: Lilypond crash, Graham Percival, 2010/10/11