|
| From: | lilypond |
| Subject: | Re: Issue 1303 in lilypond: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax. |
| Date: | Sat, 09 Oct 2010 19:58:10 +0000 |
Comment #2 on issue 1303 by paconet.org: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1303If for There's No Way This Is you mean This Is Not, then it is a bug, how would it be invalid? Docs say "You can align them this way", which is not true.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |