[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 10:19:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Achim Gratz <address@hidden>
() Sun, 03 Aug 2014 09:27:55 +0200
How about making these arguments #DEFINEs and just define
them to nothing in configure for those platform(s)?
Right, that's towards the excruciatingly correct approach,
which should also include a configure-time test. The pain
might be worth it, though, as specifying a dependent array
size in function parameter scope is a decent optimization
and security (IMHO) opportunity for non-affected platforms.
Hmmm...
BTW, did you see my request for re-sending the last mail (in
the other thread)? In case you missed it, i accidentally
deleted that message, thinking to read it in the archives,
but apparently it's not there, both then and now.
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
(if you're human and you know it)
read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
(not (via 'mailing-list)))
=> nil
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: [bug-rcs] rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/02
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: [bug-rcs] rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/02
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/03
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/03
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/03
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/03
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/04
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/04
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/05
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/05
- Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/08/09