[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:32:33 +0300 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> How about the following patch until we get this absolute filename
> business resolved? It goes back to the algorithm used in tar-1.23.90,
> except that it falls back on relative names if getcwd fails,
> and it does not attempt to optimize ".." away. For J Chapman Flack's
> example, this will cause tar to issue a warning but proceed and generate
> tar and list files.
OK, it sounds reasonable. Thanks for the patch.
> I have not pushed this.
Please, push.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2010/07/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2010/07/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2010/07/17
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Joerg Schilling, 2010/07/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Joerg Schilling, 2010/07/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=