[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cfengine-develop] Stable and development versions
From: |
Mark Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: [Cfengine-develop] Stable and development versions |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:57:19 +0100 (MET) |
On 7 Mar, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
> Quoting Hugo Gayosso <address@hidden> (2003-03-07 03:32:43 GMT):
>> Mark Burgess <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Sounds great, but one reason for starting this group is to shield
>> > myself from some of this bug-fixing noise. I would like to see a
>> > split between
>> >
>> > * patches that are bug fixes
>> > * patches that are feature requests
>>
>> https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?group=cfengine
>>
>> This of course will require an announcement from Mark to the mailing
>> lists, the Patch Manager is ready to be used at the URL posted above,
>> if you want to create "categories" for patches tell me and I can set
>> them up. I configured it to send email to bug-cfengine when a new
>> patch is submitted.
>
> The two categories (bugfix and feature) that Mark suggested would be
> useful.
>
> One of the reasons I post to bug-cfengine rather than emailing Mark
> is that I want others who have the same problem as I've just fixed to
> be able to Google for it. I dobut anyone except Mark is very
> interested in the patches I post /per se/ but they may very well be
> concerned with the problem they aim to solve. Does your system have
> any way to send the patch description to the list whilst keeping the
> patch itself aside?
This also allows others to test the patches before I have time to
apply them. Adds quality control.
>> > What we are doing now is exactly what I was hoping to avoid --
>> > i.e. writing long emails that I have little time to read carefully
>> > and then misunderstanding one another. Everything is so much easier
>> > when we can look each other in the eye.
>>
>> I understand, but I think this would be a little difficult, we have
>> people in Norway, England, USA and Netherlands.
>>
>> Any ideas how we could get all together?
>
> .nl seems to be the cheapest option. It's about 300 UKP to get to
> Norway from here but only half that for Amsterdam. (Of course, I'd be
> even more pleased if you all decided to come to lovely Durham!)
:) Yes -- NL or London are good options, due to airports etc
M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: address@hidden
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~