Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers> issue)

[Leonardo Valeri Manera]

On 15/04/2008, Ivan Raikov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>  Hi Mario,
>
>    How do you propose this is handled? The situation below occurs
>  because 501 > 6 (obviously), so chicken-setup thinks that 1.501 is
>  newer than 1.6.x. My solution would be to remove releases and
>  prerequisites of the form x.xxx because such a versioning scheme is
>  idiotic. But I am open to reasonable suggestions.

Make them comply to the version scheme supported by elf's versions egg?

You're already sanitized chicken's version numbers, high time it
happened to eggs too, no?

Of course, it would help if the tree file actually had version info
instead of release dates ...

Leo