Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers> issue)

[Leonardo Valeri Manera]

On 15/04/2008, Ivan Raikov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>   I don't understand what you mean by that. As long as a version is
>  defined as a dotted list of integers in decimal representation, 1.501
>  > 1.6.0. If you want your release versions to be ordered correctly,
>  then those version numbers have to be a well-ordered sequence in
>  increasing order and consistent representation. You can't go from
>  release 1.16 to Aleph.XVII and expect that chicken-setup would know
>  what to do.

That is exactly what I mean - version bumps should be identifiable as
such by the versions egg and chicken setup, regardless of the specific
version scheme - x.xx.x, x.x.x.x, x.x.xxx, whatever  -  used by egg
authors.

Leo