[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing.
From: |
felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing. |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:59:10 +0200 |
> Do you(felix) ever do anything where a C_word is holding the value of a
void*
> or something like that? like this:
>
> void *foo;
> C_word i;
>
> i = (C_word)foo;
>
Yep, many times. Internally everything is handled with C_word objects,
Also, the FFI does a lot of dirty casting between pointers and C_word's.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., tonyg, 2002/07/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Peter Keller, 2002/07/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., felix, 2002/07/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Peter Keller, 2002/07/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing.,
felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Anthony Carrico, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Peter Keller, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Anthony Carrico, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Peter Keller, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Anthony Carrico, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Peter Keller, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Anthony Carrico, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Anthony Carrico, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Peter Keller, 2002/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] More on aliasing., Peter Keller, 2002/07/08