Re: [Chicken-users] CVS update

[felix]

Sven Hartrumpf wrote:
> Yes, there are always cases where you want to reduce to the mimimal set of
> libraries. This option will be more acceptable for people aiming at easy
> (transparent you said above) use when it becomes easier to determine which
> libraries are needed (or at least which library functions are missing). For
> example: I tried to reduce libraries for a large compiled program and used
> -explicit-use with csc; the compiled program just reported sys#errror-hook
> undefined and I could not figure out which libraries I missed.

Right. -explicit-use is really only for hard-core tuning (BTW,
##sys#error-hook is in the `library' unit). It's mostly useful if
you don't need the evaluator, but you *have* to declare `library'
as used (unless you want to code completely in ##core#inline
and/or ##core#primitive forms).


cheers,
felix