Re: [Chicken-users] Modules + define-record-type

[felix]

Grzegorz Chrupała wrote:
> Hi all,
> Some more fun with psyntax modules and macros :)
> In Chicken 1.51 it was possible to use define-record-type in definition 
> context in a module body like so:
>
> (module foo
>   (make-bar bar? quux)
>   (define-record-type *bar*
>     (make-bar x) bar?
>     (x bar-x))
>   (define quux 42)
>   )
>
> In version 1.54 this now gives an error:
> "Error: missing definition for export(s): (quux)",
> presumably because define-record-type no longer expands to a valid group 
> of definitions.

Yes, the implementation of define-record-type changed significantly
(and is now much more efficient).

> Would it be possible to make define-record-type compatible again with 
> modules?

Yes, this will be fixed, ASAP.

Thanks for testing the module system... ;-)


cheers,
felix