Re: [Chicken-users] define-syntax available *by default*?

[Tony Garnock-Jones]

felix winkelmann wrote:
> Alas, I think syntax-case should not be the default. The problem is that
> defmacro macros can be compiled into the code, but psyntax macros
> have to be parsed at runtime, which results in (depending on machine

I don't understand this. Doesn't psyntax expand into a sequence of 
expressions, some of which populate a table with a constant data 
structure, and others of which are actual expanded code? Surely there's 
no runtime expansion going on?

Tony