[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] objc egg v0.4
|
From: |
Zbigniew |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] objc egg v0.4 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:21:17 -0600 |
On 1/21/06, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
> objc:box/unbox instead of objc:wrap/unwrap
That's not a bad idea.
> obj-c:* instead of objc:*)?
The "objc" prefix is, near as I can tell, universal in Lisp--OpenMCL,
Gauche--and other implementations---Python, Ruby, even Emacs'
objc-mode---and I think we should stick with that. On a personal
note, I find obj-c:class-name to be more visually confusing than
objc:class-name. Of course, if enough people support a change I will
make it.