|
| From: | felix winkelmann |
| Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] distributing configure.in and Makefile.am |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:21:19 +0200 |
On 8/31/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that configure.in and Makefile.am do not need to be distributed in a tarball? What an enduser actually needs is configure and Makefile.in. I'm thinking if the user needs to run the Autotools again for some reason, then he should be downloading a full source tree from Darcs. Please inform if I've misunderstood Autoconf's expected mode of operation.
I would leave them in. It should be possible for someone who downloaded a source tarball to modify the Makefiles (without wading through automake generated stuff). cheers, felix -- http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |