Re: [Chicken-users] url egg

[Daishi Kato]

OK, let me first add it to the svn repo.
url/url.scm is now this modified version.
Please modify the uri part as you like. I did not change a lot since I
was not sure if I could break the compatibility with the original uri-
procedures.

Things we will have to do are to write a doc (which should be eggdoc),
and to update url.setup and url.meta. I would use a new version number 2.0.

Thanks,
Daishi

On 2/22/07, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if I understand your suggestion all.
> Are you saying that the url egg should contain url.scm and uri.scm and
> you would clean up uri.scm?
> I'm totally lost about the urc: prefix issue.
>
> Daishi
>
> On 2/22/07, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Just url is fine. I would remove the html: stuff altogether from the
> > SLIB derived code & place the ftp: stuff (only 1 proc I think) into
> > its' own file. So only url related code is in url. Should also decide
> > on namespace style. I kept the urc:/uri: prefixs & added '-' versions
> > of the symbols. (It was to be a port of SLIB code.) But we only need
> > one style, I suggest the '-' style.