[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] syntactically completeness / consistency
From: |
Ivan Shmakov |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] syntactically completeness / consistency |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:49:07 +0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "F" == Felix <address@hidden> writes:
F> With the most recent commits (4.4.4), chicken is now consistent in
F> the way core forms are handled. There are no hard-coded special
F> forms and everything can be redefined, reexported and modified on
F> import. Syntax may now also expand into module forms (if at
F> toplevel, local or nested modules are still not available and not
F> strictly necessary).
F> So, the transition to hygienic macros and a real module system is
F> hereby complete, not taking into account the bugs that will still
F> lurk everywhere and the low performance of the expander, which will
F> be worked on.
While not using Chicken in any way worth speaking of these days,
I still consider this great news!
F> Thanks to everybody for putting up with the disruptive and painful
F> migration work and for all the help.
--
FSF associate member #7257