chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Posix "realpath"


From: Jim Ursetto
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Posix "realpath"
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:42:26 -0500

In case it helps, I've added resolve-pathname to the posix-extras egg in 
version 0.1.2.

On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:

> 
> On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
>> 
>>> Note that normalize-path is not the same as realpath and that although 
>>> realpath would be nice to have calling the system realpath works just fine 
>>> and so this is a suggestion and not a request ....
>> 
>> What is "the system realpath"?
> 
> Specifically, I don't understand from your mail whether you have successfully 
> bound realpath(3) in your own code, whether you want this binding to be added 
> to the posix unit, or whether you wanted a reimplementation in pure Scheme.  
> I'm quite confused, sorry.
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]