[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Posix "realpath"
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Posix "realpath" |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:42:26 -0500 |
In case it helps, I've added resolve-pathname to the posix-extras egg in
version 0.1.2.
On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
>
>> On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
>>
>>> Note that normalize-path is not the same as realpath and that although
>>> realpath would be nice to have calling the system realpath works just fine
>>> and so this is a suggestion and not a request ....
>>
>> What is "the system realpath"?
>
> Specifically, I don't understand from your mail whether you have successfully
> bound realpath(3) in your own code, whether you want this binding to be added
> to the posix unit, or whether you wanted a reimplementation in pure Scheme.
> I'm quite confused, sorry.
>