[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:34:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> Simple: for those who prefer functional updates, but don't want their
> lists to keep growing endlessly.
Fair enough, though the persistent-hash-map egg probably is the Right
Thing.
> Also, in some cases duplicate entries really mean something different
> (for example in alist->uri query attribute mappings and such).
I don't understand this example.
--
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
[P]olice in many lands are now complaining that local arrestees are insisting
on having their Miranda rights read to them, just like perps in American TV
cop shows. When it's explained to them that they are in a different country,
where those rights do not exist, they become outraged. --Neal Stephenson
- [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Christian Kellermann, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, John Cowan, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, John Cowan, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/13