[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:41:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> ((a . "foo") (a . "bar")) => ?a=foo;a=bar
>
> A HTTP server might interpret this query string differently from ?a=foo
Ah, I see. Yes, you're right; that's not really an a-list, as you wouldn't
search it with assoc (or equivalent).
--
MEET US AT POINT ORANGE AT MIDNIGHT BRING YOUR DUCK OR PREPARE TO FACE WUGGUMS
John Cowan address@hidden http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Christian Kellermann, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, John Cowan, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, John Cowan, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Loïc Faure-Lacroix, 2013/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Alist versus Hash-table, Peter Bex, 2013/11/13