[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cp-patches] java.util Documentation Patch 02
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: [cp-patches] java.util Documentation Patch 02 |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:58:12 +0200 |
Hi,
Deep inside your documentation patch (thanks for that again!) I found
this:
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 03:02, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> --- java/util/AbstractList.java 7 May 2002 05:13:05 -0000 1.21
> +++ java/util/AbstractList.java 16 Aug 2004 00:57:59 -0000
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ public abstract class AbstractList exten
> * <code>add(int, Object)</code> and <code>remove(int)</code> methods.
> * Otherwise, this field may be ignored.
> */
> - protected int modCount;
> + protected transient int modCount;
Was this change deliberately?
You didn't mention the change in the ChangeLog.
Are you sure this is OK? It does make sense to make it transient since
it should be cleared after (de)serialization. But it does change the
serialization of classes extending AbstractList.
Cheers,
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [cp-patches] java.util Documentation Patch 02,
Mark Wielaard <=