[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: org.omg
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: org.omg |
Date: |
06 Oct 2002 10:20:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Sascha Brawer <address@hidden> writes:
> However, we'd need to do a lot more for this to become useful. Maybe this
> is obvious to everyone on the list, but in case it isn't, let me outline
> what would be needed for CORBA support:
>
> 1. Use an IDL-to-Java compiler tool (like Sun's idlj) to generate
> Java code for standard IDL files provided by the OMG. For example,
> package org.omg.IOP is derived from IDL, and not directly available
> at ftp.omg.org/pub/ javartf/.
>
> Having done this, we'd have roughly the same as is documented on
> the Javadoc pages for Sun's J2SE 1.4. AFAIK, this should be enough
> to run an ORB on a Classpath-based JRE.
That would be good.
> 2. Provide an actual implementation for all those interfaces and
> abstract classes.
I didn't think the JDK actually provided an ORB. To my knowledge
everyone goes to a vendor for an ORB implementation. My lack of
actually using CORBA from Java is showing here.
> 3. Write a GNU version of an IDL-to-Java compiler (i.e., a replacement
> for idlj).
More tools always welcome in the classpath-tools subproject.
> (1) without (2) is somewhat useful: users could run CORBA applications if
> they license an ORB from someone. Also, (1) is a prerequisite for
> supporting CORBA in Classpath. But the big amount of work is (2).
>
> By the way, could we legally use Sun's idlj for (1), or do we have to do
> (3) first?
Yes, you can use idlj or javah as needed.
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- org.omg, Brian Jones, 2002/10/06
- Re: org.omg, Mark Wielaard, 2002/10/06
- Re: org.omg, Giannis Georgalis, 2002/10/06
- Re: org.omg, Sascha Brawer, 2002/10/06
- Re: org.omg,
Brian Jones <=
- Re: org.omg, Sascha Brawer, 2002/10/06
- Re: org.omg, Mark Wielaard, 2002/10/06
- Re: org.omg, Stephen Crawley, 2002/10/06
- Re: org.omg, Brian Jones, 2002/10/07
- Re: org.omg, Sascha Brawer, 2002/10/07
- Re: org.omg, Wes Beebee, 2002/10/07