RE: Thoughts on 'reference classes'

[Dalibor Topic]

--- Chris Gray <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2003, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> 
> > Maybe we should just take the TeX approach and
> just converge to some
> > non-rational number like e, so we can say that we
> are now at version
> > 2.7182 :)
> 
> Hm, I think e is already taken by LaTeX. What else
> is there? (Apart from i 
> :>).

Are complex numbers allowed?

cheers,
dalibor topic

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/