[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#290377: classpath-common: why don't you provide a jar archive ?
|
From: |
Michael Koch |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bug#290377: classpath-common: why don't you provide a jar archive ? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:05:13 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 07:45 schrieb jewel:
Welcome back, John.
> Do all classpath VMs have native code to load jar files? Does it
> make sense to distribute a jar instead?
The ones the don't have the code to load jars can install classes
instead of glibj.zip.
A JAR is basically a ZIP. There is no advantage when we call it
glibj.jar. This will probably get only more problems as people might
try to add it to their classpathes because its a JAR.
Michael
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/