Re: RFC: Generics branch VM interface

[Andrew John Hughes]

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 20:23 +0100, Chris Burdess wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > ...  Also, on reading the new specs. for this stuff, something
> > seems to apply that this run-time dropping may only be temporary (i.e.
> > that the idea is to ween people off non-generic code).  But I'd be
> > really interested to hear the opinion of others on this.  
> 
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/06/12/Comparable

Did I miss something?  How does this relate to what I said?
-- 
Andrew :-)

Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint)
attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com

"Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
`Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn."
-- Richard Stallman

Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part