[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] What about creating javax.sql.*
From: |
Arnaud Vandyck |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] What about creating javax.sql.* |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:06:52 +0200 (CEST) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Maybe my mail wasn't clear enought but this is the response I
expected:
___________________________________________________________
/ Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 16:11, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| > Can someone tell me if a free implementation already exists? Is
| > the classpathx project interrested?
|
| The javax.sql, javax.transaction and javax.transaction.xa packages
| are part of GNU Classpath <http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath>
| and are, as far as I know, mostly implemented.
That was what I was looking for! My problem is I want these
implementations whithout the obligation of using the full classpath
project. I wanted to package these for Debian[1]. And I don't know how
to provide jta and jdbc-stdext-2.0 with free software.
So! Is it possible to get jta and jdbc-stdext-2.0 separate from the
full classpath so I can package these for Debian? Is it resonable as a
transition (waiting full feature classpath api - awt and so...-)?
| If you could check their status and maybe add some documentation
| that would be very much appreciated.
I can do that in one or two weeks. I check the full classpath cvs and
the send patches if I am able to :-).
| If you want the result to be part of the main distribution then
| contributions should be based on publicly available documentation
| and be original, so no copying allowed if you want the result be
| part of the main distribution. Please contact the address@hidden
| mailinglist for more information.
Crossposted...
| As was suggested earlier it would be very nice if you could check
| the implementation against free software packages that are already
| using these packages.
JOTM[2] seems to implement jta:
Related specifications[3]
* Sun: Java Transaction API (JTA) Specification,
* Sun: Java Transaction Service (JTS) Specification,
* OMG: Transaction Service,
* OASIS: Business Transaction Protocol.
commons-dbcp[4] implements javax.sql.DataSource. I think many other
projects must do this. Not only drivers.
So, IMHO, it's not so important to have a implementation of the
reference API but it's important to provide the reference API (I don't
know if I am clear?).
[1] see http://bugs.debian.org/188158 and
http://bugs.debian.org/188196
[2] http://www.objectweb.org/jotm/
[3] http://www.objectweb.org/jotm/doc/
[4] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/
- -- Arnaud Vandyck @ work
FingerPrint = 82F3 45D0 F1B2 D79E D0BE 5188 E2FC C566 EEB6 B4C2
,---- ----.
| Linux Copy Party le 26 avril 2003 au Val BenoƮt |
| http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/lcp/ |
`---- ----'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+lXpz4vzFZu62tMIRApAIAJ94NQW4m9YLUlyY05hVt8hRCKdvdQCggVdW
TTGxIevvcTQy6fJWVPDbYrc=
=z5ry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] What about creating javax.sql.*, Mark Wielaard, 2003/04/08
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] What about creating javax.sql.*,
Arnaud Vandyck <=